With the 5G-enabled LG Velvet, the South Korean phone-maker is trying something new. The Velvet doesn’t belong to any of the company’s established lines, like the G- and V- series. It looks different than most LG phones and at an expected price of $600 to $700 for the US, it’s more affordable than LG’s G8 and V60. International prices aren’t available but it’s about £600 or AU$1,100, converted from South Korean won.
- Sleek design
- Headphone jack
- Good battery life so far
- No new standalone software features
- Fingerprint reader is finicky
The Velvet is LG’s signal that it’s heading towards another, more affordable but thoughtful direction. But the company should go even further. After spending time with the Velvet, I would still prefer something like the OnePlus 8 ($699 at OnePlus). While it doesn’t have a headphone jack or work with a secondary screen accessory like the Velvet, it does have a great camera, a silky-smooth screen with a higher refresh rate and a more powerful processor.
The Velvet is available in South Korea, but because there is no official US price yet, I can’t give this phone a fully rated review. (Once there is one though, I’ll update this piece with final subratings. Note that this means the overall rating may change from what you currently see.) But even if it’s expected to be cheaper than its top-tier G8 and V60 brethren, the Velvet now faces a whole new set of competitors, including the aforementioned OnePlus 8, the Galaxy A71 5G and the Motorola Edge — all of which deliver great specs and 5G within the same price. Though the Velvet isn’t an entirely new radical direction for LG, it’s certainly a diverging path. The company should continue with the Velvet, or something similar, while outpacing rivals in the same price bracket.
LG Velvet: The best looking LG phone we’ve seen in a while
LG’s best-looking phone
The Velvet looks unlike any premium US LG phone before it and it’s the best-looking LG phone I’ve handled in a while. Compared with the V60, for instance, the Velvet has tapered edges, sharper corners and a rear camera array that runs vertically, not horizontally. The left and right edges of the screen fall off to the sides, which gives it a more chic look, and though it’s about as tall as the V60, it’s narrower, slimmer and lighter — and ultimately more comfortable to hold.
If this introduces a new design language for LG phones, I’m for it. But I have a few design gripes. For instance, I don’t like how the corners of the screen don’t run all the way to the edges. Unlike the Galaxy S20, where the bezels and frame are consistent and thin all around, I can see the silver framing on the corners of my white Velvet unit. The center teardrop notch can stand to be smaller too.
Given how stale LG phones have looked for a bit, this is a refreshing change. The Velvet looks more modern, it’s sleek and I love that the rear cameras aren’t housed together by some single circular bump. And to confirm, the Velvet does have a headphone jack. LG’s commitment to the beloved audio port is what makes its premium phones stand out, which is good news to wired headphone users.
Velvet’s Dual Screen accessory
The Velvet has a sharp and vibrant 6.8-inch OLED screen. It also has a 60Hz display, which is common on most phones, but that’s a lower refresh rate than competitors such as the OnePlus 8, which has a 90Hz display. Like the V60 and other LG phones, the Velvet works with a Dual Screen accessory that adds a second screen.
With the second screen you can multitask and display two apps at the same time, or expand certain apps across both screens so they work together like a tablet. (Though you’ll have to deal with a hinge that cuts down the middle.) You can also set up one screen as a digital controller for mobile gaming, which is compatible with some games.
Though LG didn’t create a stylus especially for the Velvet, I was able to use one with the phone. I used Wacom’s Bamboo Ink Smart Stylus and despite it being made for Windows 10 ($140 at Amazon) devices, it worked fine with the Velvet. By clicking on its built-in button I could quickly call up LG’s QMemo Plus app to jot down notes, capture GIFs and, if I’m really bored, color in some preloaded drawings.
With US pricing for the Velvet still unknown, pricing with its Dual Screen is even further up in the air. With previous LG phones, some carriers bundled the case with the phone, sold it separately or offered it at a discount. Each network will have its own methods, so once the Velvet is official in the US, keep your eyes peeled on the various deals and their inevitable restrictions.
LG Velvet’s triple-rear camera takes fine pictures
Under bright, clear lighting the Velvet’s camera took sharp pictures that were colorful and in focus. With its 8-megapixel wide-angle camera, which I accessed by pinching out on the screen’s viewfinder, I was able to fit more content within each frame. Keep in mind that pictures taken with the wide-angle camera aren’t as sharp as images captured on the standard camera, which shoots at a 12-megapixel resolution by default, but can go as high as 48 megapixels.
The camera has a digital zoom up to 10x. At this level, pictures were a lot blurrier and muddled. Some of the zoomed-in photos I took were reminiscent of watercolors or Impressionist paintings. If you plan on using the zoom to get more details of faraway objects, you won’t achieve it with this phone.
Since it was Fourth of July weekend recently, I also took a few photos at night while lighting some sparklers. This is a notoriously difficult lighting situation and while the images came out clear enough, they were a bit washed-out and weren’t as vibrant or as deeply contrasted as the ones I took on, say, the Pixel 3 ($450 at Amazon) in 2018.
Photos taken with the front-facing camera were clear, with accurate skin-tone and colors. Recording video was also solid. Though it doesn’t have optical image stabilization, the footage I recorded while standing in one place was fine. The camera was able to readjust its focus and exposure quickly and it picked up audio clearly.
LG Velvet’s performance is fast, but not as fast as flagship phones
The Velvet is powered by a variant of the Snapdragon 765 chipset that enables 5G connectivity. It’s not as robust as Qualcomm’s latest 865 processor, but it’s what keeps the phone’s price relatively lower than other flagships. The Motorola Edge and the ZTE Axon 11 5G also feature the 765 chipset, and they too both have a premium look but aren’t as powerful and expensive as other marquee phones.
Benchmark scores reflect this sort of middle-of-the-pack position. Phones with the 865 processor, like the LG V60 and OnePlus 8, scored higher marks than the Velvet, but the Velvet comfortably beat out the Moto G Stylus ($265 at Amazon) and G Power, which have the 665 chipset.
When it comes to daily usage though, I didn’t notice much lag or any notable “lack” of speed on the Velvet when comparing it to the V60 except in one thing: the fingerprint reader. It appeared to take a hair longer to unlock the Velvet using the scanner than what I recalled on the LG V60. It also took one or two more attempts than it should have to read my thumbprint accurately, to a point where it was getting a bit irritating. Other than that, however, the Velvet opened apps, launched the camera and scrolled through web pages with ease.
Preliminary tests for continuous video playback on Airplane mode, showed that the Velvet’s 4,300-mAh battery lasted 22 hours and 38 minutes. This is a robust battery life. For comparison, the OnePlus 8, which also has a 4,300-mAh battery clocked in 18 hours and 47 minutes. The Galaxy A51 ($400 at Amazon), with its 4,000-mAh battery, lasted 16 hours and 10 minutes. We’re going to run more battery tests while streaming video. When the results are in, I’ll update this review and its final rating.
LG Velvet spec comparison
|LG Velvet||OnePlus 8||Motorola Edge||Motorola Moto G Power|
|Display size, resolution||6.8-inch OLED; 2,460×1,080 pixels||6.55-inch AMOLED; 2,400×1,080 pixels||6.7-inch OLED; 2,340 x 1,080 pixels||6.4-inch LCD; 2,300×1,080 pixels|
|Dimensions (Inches)||6.58 x 2.92 x 0.31 in||6.3 x 2.8 x 0.31 in||6.36 x 2.8 x 0.37 in||6.29 x 2.98 x 0.38 in|
|Dimensions (Millimeters)||167.2 x 74.1 x 7.9 mm||160 x 72.9 x 8.0 mm||161.6 x 71.1 x 9.29 mm||159.85 x 75.8 x 9.63 mm|
|Weight (Ounces, Grams)||6.35 oz; 180g||6.35 oz; 180g||6.63 oz; 188g||7.01 oz; 199g|
|Mobile software||Android 10||Android 10||Android 10||Android 10|
|Camera||48-megapixel (standard), 8-megapixel (wide-angle), 5-megapixel (depth sensing)||48-megapixel (standard), 16-megapixel (ultra-wide), 2-megapixel (macro)||64-megapixel (standard), 8-megapixel (telephotos), 16-megapixel (macro/ultrawide-angle)||16-megapixel (wide-angle), 2-megapixel (macro), 8-megapixel (ultra-wide angle)|
|Processor||Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G||Qualcomm Snapdragon 865||Qualcomm Snapdragon 765||Snapdragon 665|
|RAM||6GB, 8GB||8GB, 12GB||10GB||4GB|
|Expandable storage||Up to 2TB||No||Up to 1TB||Up to 512GB|
|Special features||5G enabled; water resistant (IP68); wireless charging, Fast Charging 4.0||5G enabled; Warp Charge; 90Hz refresh rate||5G enabled. 90Hz refresh rate, 18W Turbo Charging||N/A|
|Price off-contract (USD)||Expected to be $600-$700||$699 (8GB RAM/128GB), $799 (12GB RAM/256GB)||$699||$250|
|Price (GBP)||From South Korean won converts to about £596||£599 (8GB RAM/128GB), £699 (12GB RAM/256GB)||£549||Converts to about £199|
|Price (AUD)||From South Korean won converts to about AU$1,077||Converts to about: AU$1,103 (8GB RAM/128GB), AU$1,261 (12GB RAM/256GB)||Converts to about AU$1,007||Converts to about AU$365|
First published on July 15.